<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/</link>
	<description>Over 100 Years of Dedicated Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBCreekRes</title>
		<link>http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>BBCreekRes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elburnherald.com/?p=24836#comment-806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OneWhoCares, you are spot on in your assessment. EVERY newspaper pole that pertained to the Elburn Station has reflected that residents do NOT want this high density development.

BB Creek residents have voiced their complaints about Shodeen linking into the water/sewer system as well. You be be certain that there are several self serving aspects to this project. 

It really bothers me that all of these Villages the County &amp; School Board fought so hard to get the impact fee&#039;s up to a near suitable level only to back pedal now, especially on a 10-15 year project!

One thing certain, 
Elburn is on the Developers Maps, 
As long as they continue roll out the Red Carpet, hand them the deed to the village &amp; let the resident taxes cover any downfalls that may occur later we will only see more of the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OneWhoCares, you are spot on in your assessment. EVERY newspaper pole that pertained to the Elburn Station has reflected that residents do NOT want this high density development.</p>
<p>BB Creek residents have voiced their complaints about Shodeen linking into the water/sewer system as well. You be be certain that there are several self serving aspects to this project. </p>
<p>It really bothers me that all of these Villages the County &amp; School Board fought so hard to get the impact fee&#8217;s up to a near suitable level only to back pedal now, especially on a 10-15 year project!</p>
<p>One thing certain,<br />
Elburn is on the Developers Maps,<br />
As long as they continue roll out the Red Carpet, hand them the deed to the village &amp; let the resident taxes cover any downfalls that may occur later we will only see more of the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneWhoCares</title>
		<link>http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>OneWhoCares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elburnherald.com/?p=24836#comment-805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“What’s the incentive to come to Elburn?” Trustee Jerry Schmidt asked. “If we approve this, we’re throwing three years work (to get the Elburn Station development approved) out the window. It’s not a level playing field, and I just can’t vote for it.”

Hastert agreed that if all municipalities weren’t party to it, the agreement was imperfect.

====================================

 Ya know that is an old saying and I quote&gt;&gt;


&quot;No form of government can ever succeed, as long as greed exists&quot; Gandhi


 Is it possible that there are self serving interests among our trusted servants? One thing is sure that the people of Elburn DO NOT WANT MORE DEVELOPMANT !! Yet some of our trusted servants seems to ignore that fact. 

   Kind of like the need for the city to buy the church parking lot when there is more than enough parking with in a 300/500 foot proximity of the local establishments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“What’s the incentive to come to Elburn?” Trustee Jerry Schmidt asked. “If we approve this, we’re throwing three years work (to get the Elburn Station development approved) out the window. It’s not a level playing field, and I just can’t vote for it.”</p>
<p>Hastert agreed that if all municipalities weren’t party to it, the agreement was imperfect.</p>
<p>====================================</p>
<p> Ya know that is an old saying and I quote&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>&#8220;No form of government can ever succeed, as long as greed exists&#8221; Gandhi</p>
<p> Is it possible that there are self serving interests among our trusted servants? One thing is sure that the people of Elburn DO NOT WANT MORE DEVELOPMANT !! Yet some of our trusted servants seems to ignore that fact. </p>
<p>   Kind of like the need for the city to buy the church parking lot when there is more than enough parking with in a 300/500 foot proximity of the local establishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneWhoCares</title>
		<link>http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>OneWhoCares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elburnherald.com/?p=24836#comment-804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Anderson voted to enter into the IGA based on the concern that the taxpayers will be asked to pay for schools if the developers don’t.

“We need to protect our existing residents,” Anderson said.

--------------------

 To tell you the truth let Elburn Station development. Sho-Deen representative Dave Patzelt go back to the rat pack with a fee of $12,000.00 per unit or build Elburn a new school with the project. If they don&#039;t like it tell them to go pound sand and try to build somewhere else and let Kane County take the land that is required for the Anderson road overpass by eminent domain.Sure it may cost Elburn money,but a lot less if Sho-Deen get its way. Dang Get Sho-Deen to work of finishing the South side of Keslinger road. You know that Blackberry thing that was worked out into bankruptcy. 
  Then too the infrastructure of our waste water can&#039;t handle what Sho-Deen wants and who&#039;s going to flip the bill...Yes you Elburn Tax Payer&#039;s will prolly add another 10 to 20% onto your city bills.
  Most people in Elburn DON&#039;T WANT Sho-Deen&#039;s Greed drive project to upset our fragile town so Sho-Deen Go somewhere else and will let the county deal with the Anderson Road extension that we were promised 6 years ago.The rail road extension came in $43,000,000.00 under budget,but also out people/bike over pass for people  to get to the train station and Anderson Road was in that budget if I remember. The concret pier&#039;s for a 6 lane road were in place buy the coach yard for metra. Google mape it and you&#039;ll see them 
  Sho-Deen... the eminent domain senerio is one option. My feeling our just that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Anderson voted to enter into the IGA based on the concern that the taxpayers will be asked to pay for schools if the developers don’t.</p>
<p>“We need to protect our existing residents,” Anderson said.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> To tell you the truth let Elburn Station development. Sho-Deen representative Dave Patzelt go back to the rat pack with a fee of $12,000.00 per unit or build Elburn a new school with the project. If they don&#8217;t like it tell them to go pound sand and try to build somewhere else and let Kane County take the land that is required for the Anderson road overpass by eminent domain.Sure it may cost Elburn money,but a lot less if Sho-Deen get its way. Dang Get Sho-Deen to work of finishing the South side of Keslinger road. You know that Blackberry thing that was worked out into bankruptcy.<br />
  Then too the infrastructure of our waste water can&#8217;t handle what Sho-Deen wants and who&#8217;s going to flip the bill&#8230;Yes you Elburn Tax Payer&#8217;s will prolly add another 10 to 20% onto your city bills.<br />
  Most people in Elburn DON&#8217;T WANT Sho-Deen&#8217;s Greed drive project to upset our fragile town so Sho-Deen Go somewhere else and will let the county deal with the Anderson Road extension that we were promised 6 years ago.The rail road extension came in $43,000,000.00 under budget,but also out people/bike over pass for people  to get to the train station and Anderson Road was in that budget if I remember. The concret pier&#8217;s for a 6 lane road were in place buy the coach yard for metra. Google mape it and you&#8217;ll see them<br />
  Sho-Deen&#8230; the eminent domain senerio is one option. My feeling our just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBCreekRes</title>
		<link>http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>BBCreekRes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 01:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elburnherald.com/?p=24836#comment-803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, look at it this way. You rally can&#039;t blame villages for wanting to remain competitive with each other. 
You really cant blame developers for wanting to trim their bottom line, there is no limit to the greed involved there.

You CAN blame the school district. Giving up an inch on fee&#039;s was a huge mistake. 
Nearly EVERY year they come holding out their hands for MORE &amp; More &amp; More. Then they threaten to make the children suffer by making cuts.

Well remember Kaneland, You gave away impact fee&#039;s, put your hands back in your pockets! Is that a lint ball?  GOOD, that is whats in my pocket as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look at it this way. You rally can&#8217;t blame villages for wanting to remain competitive with each other.<br />
You really cant blame developers for wanting to trim their bottom line, there is no limit to the greed involved there.</p>
<p>You CAN blame the school district. Giving up an inch on fee&#8217;s was a huge mistake.<br />
Nearly EVERY year they come holding out their hands for MORE &amp; More &amp; More. Then they threaten to make the children suffer by making cuts.</p>
<p>Well remember Kaneland, You gave away impact fee&#8217;s, put your hands back in your pockets! Is that a lint ball?  GOOD, that is whats in my pocket as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rak40</title>
		<link>http://elburnherald.com/24836/2012/06/07/moving-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>rak40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elburnherald.com/?p=24836#comment-802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, I must confess to possessing limited knowledge of &quot;impact fees&quot; and how they are established.  However, listening to the discussion that took place on Monday regarding the IGA, I was somewhat concerned that not all board members appeared to grasp the consequences of the wording in the agreement and, indeed, the meaning of certain words.  by this time in the process, I feel they should all have been much more conversant and knowledgeable on the subject.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I must confess to possessing limited knowledge of &#8220;impact fees&#8221; and how they are established.  However, listening to the discussion that took place on Monday regarding the IGA, I was somewhat concerned that not all board members appeared to grasp the consequences of the wording in the agreement and, indeed, the meaning of certain words.  by this time in the process, I feel they should all have been much more conversant and knowledgeable on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
