- 2014 Football Preview: Helmet to helmet
- 2014 Tennis Preview: Bedrock of success on court
- 2014 Girls Cross Country Preview: Trail mix
- 2014 Boys Soccer Preview: Soccer hopes for more of the same
- 2014 Golf Preview: Chipping away at challenges
- 2014 Boys Cross Country Preview: Boys XC always in the running
Letter: Continuing the health care discussion
To Bob Morgan: Your response to my letter is mostly very heartening, and I want to commend you for taking the time and interest to involve yourself in this important issue.
Second, while the general tone of your letter is contemptuous, I find there to be an impressive amount of agreement. We share a passion for the issue. You state that â€œtoo many politicians are for sale,â€ â€œI think we can all agree that pharmaceutical companies gouge us all,â€ and then you offer a lot of good tactics for dealing with the problem.
Some of your arguments are circular and conflicting. You love one doctor and trust them all, but you think some other guy is so evil he killed your friend, and this is a rationale for huge court payments instead of tighter regulatory oversight.
Pharma is trying to help us out, but they are also gouging us. Maybe they are helping us by gouging us. Obama inflated the uninsured estimate of 30 million, because you find there to be 250 million insured. Excuse me, as the population of the USA is 305 million, that implies there are 80 million uninsured. I think the correct answer is around 40, but I really think this is not the issue.
You would like to pay doctors based on their value. That’s not the way free enterprise is supposed to work. Pricing is suppose to stabilize near cost. The value for saving a life is infinite, and that is the problem. Where the burden of payment is shifted from the demand, the demand is infinite.
You have some misguided notion that CHIPs is representative of government insured healthcare. Actually, â€œMedicareâ€ and â€œMedicaidâ€ are the case for government healthcare. And, by the way, I am intimately familiar with CHIPs. My wife had a urinary infection. She took a simple antibiotic and was well in a few weeks, but the exercise made your favored Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) unwilling to cover her at any cost. So she joined the involuntary ranks of the uninsured until I could buy CHIPs coverage for her.
BCBS wrote that policy too; it cost me something like $900 per month, for $5,000 deductible and covered nothing. The key point about CHIPs is that by definition the insured parties are uninsurable otherwise, that is they are specifically not representative of the general population as a whole. So the CHIPs program is hardly a case model for a general healthcare plan run by government.